Chairman's Library
Visit the Chairman’s Library. Get insights directly from one of the nation’s preeminent authorities on the medical liability industry and political reform initiatives.

Feedback
Have something specific you would like to speak with us about? Send us a note.

 
 Director’s Forum

Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

by David B. Troxel, MD, Medical Director, Board of Governors

Dr. Troxel In a review of 363 consecutive closed claims from January 2004 through January 2006 at The Doctors Company, 3 percent involved deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Most malpractice claims of this type result from the failure to recognize patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and implement appropriate prophylaxis, failure to diagnose DVT in patients who subsequently have a PE, and failure to rule out PE in patients with nondiagnostic pulmonary

symptoms. When VTE is seriously considered in the differential diagnosis, it should be confirmed or excluded by appropriate testing.

In the fourth quarter 2008 issue of The Doctor’s Advocate, I reviewed the risk factors for VTE, the prevention of VTE, and the diagnosis of DVT. The discussion in this issue will focus on the diagnosis and treatment of acute pulmonary embolism.

Diagnosis of Acute PE
Without treatment, pulmonary embolism has a mortality rate of 30 percent, result¬ing largely from recurrent embolism. Most emboli are multiple, primarily involve the lower lobes, and cause pulmonary hemor¬rhage. Only 10 percent of emboli cause pulmonary infarction. The symptoms and signs of PE are relatively nonspecific and include dyspnea, pleuritic pain, cough, hemoptysis, tachypnea, and tachycardia. Fewer than one-third of patients have symptoms or signs of DVT.

Lab tests often show leukocytosis and elevation of lactate dehydrogenese (LDH) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) with normal bilirubin. Troponin 1 and troponin T are elevated in 30 to 50 percent of patients with moderate to large PE, due to right ventricular strain. Arterial blood gases (ABGs) may show hypoxemia, hypocapnia, and respiratory alkalosis; however, these changes are often absent, so ABGs have limited diagnostic value. ECG and chest x-ray abnormalities are usually nonspecific and are seldom helpful diagnostically. Echocardiograms show abnormalities suggestive of PE in 30 to 40 percent of patients (increased right ventricular size, decreased RV function, and tricuspid regurgitation). Clinical assessment and these studies alone are usually not sufficient to reliably confirm or exclude the diagnosis of PE— and further testing is required.

  • Ventilation/perfusion lung scan (V/Q scan) is the best validated non¬invasive approach to evaluating patients with suspected PE. However, a high percentage of scans are nondiagnostic, and scans are most useful when they are either negative or indicate a high probability of PE.
    • Patients with both a high clinical and high V/Q scan probability have a 95 percent likelihood of PE.
    • Patients with both a low clinical and low V/Q scan probability have a 5 percent likelihood of PE.
    • A normal V/Q scan virtually excludes PE.
  • Pulmonary angiography is the defini¬tive diagnostic test. When negative, the diagnosis of clinically significant PE is excluded.
  • Spiral (helical) CT scanning with intravenous contrast (CT pulmonary angiography, CT-PA) is an increas¬ingly available noninvasive approach, although results vary depending on the experience of the person interpreting the images:
    • 83 percent of patients with PE have a positive CT-PA (sensitivity).
    • 96 percent of patients without PE have a negative CT-PA (specificity).
  • CT-PA in conjunction with the modified Wells score.
    • If the CT-PA is positive, the likelihood of PE in patients with high, intermediate, or low clinical probability is 96, 92, and 58 percent, respectively.
    • If the CT-PA is negative, the likeli¬hood that PE is absent in patients with low, intermediate, or high clini¬cal probability is 96, 89, and 60 percent, respectively.
A Practical Approach to the Diagnosis of Acute PE
  1. CT experienced institutions:
    • If PE is suspected, apply the modified Wells criteria (clinical criteria used to estimate the probability of PE).
    • If a patient is classified as PE unlikely, proceed to the D-dimer test. A negative test (<500 ng/ml) excludes PE.
    • Patients classified as PE likely or who are PE unlikely with elevated D-dimer levels (>500 ng/ml) should undergo CT-PA. A positive CT-PA confirms the diagnosis of PE; if negative, PE is excluded.
  2. CT inexperienced institutions:
    • If PE is suspected, apply the modified Wells criteria and obtain a V/Q scan.
    • A normal V/Q scan regardless ofclinical probability excludes PE.
    • A low probability V/Q scan plus a low clinical probability excludes PE.
    • A high probability V/Q scan plus a high clinical probability confirms PE.
    • For all other combinations, obtain either pulmonary angiogram or
      serial lower extremity venous ultra¬sound examinations.

Treatment of VTE
Most deaths from PE occur within the first few hours due to recurrent PE. Therefore, if there is high clinical suspicion or a diagnosis of PE, anticoagulant therapy is promptly initiated—usually with subcuta¬neous low molecular weight (LMW) hepa¬rin or intravenous unfractionated heparin with the goal of achieving a therapeutic level within the first 24 hours. Heparin should be continued for at least five days. For most patients, oral anticoagulation can be started simultaneously with the heparin and overlapped with heparin for at least four to five days. Heparin can be discontinued on day five or six if the internationalized normalized ratio (INR) has been therapeutic for two consecutive days. Persistent hypotension due to PE is an accepted indication for thrombolytic therapy. However, due to the risk of major hemorrhage, anticoagulation must be temporarily discontinued during infusion.

Hospital medical staff protocols for the treatment of VTE should be followed.

 

Additional Resources

Each of the following references is from UpToDate, Rose BD (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA 2008. Copyright 2008 UpToDate, Inc. Accessed on November 28, 2007. For more information, visit www.uptodate.com.
Thompson BT, Hales CA. Overview of acute pulmonary embolism.
Thompson BT, Hales CA. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.
Tapson VF. Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism.


 

The Doctor’s Advocate is published by The Doctors Company to advise and inform its members about loss prevention and insurance issues.

 

The guidelines suggested in this newsletter are not rules, do not constitute legal advice, and do not ensure a successful outcome. They attempt to define principles of practice for providing appropriate care. The principles are not inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods reasonably directed at obtaining the same results.

 

The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any treatment must be made by each health care provider in light of all circumstances prevailing in the individual situation and in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which the care is rendered.

 

The Doctor’s Advocate is published quarterly by Corporate Communications, The Doctors Company. Letters and articles, to be edited and published at the editor’s discretion, are welcome. The views expressed are those of the letter writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or official policy of The Doctors Company. Please sign your letters, and address them to the editor.