Legislative, Regulatory, and Judicial Advocacy
We lead the medical malpractice insurance industry with a dedicated, award-winning Government Relations team and the only medical liability advocacy program covering all 50 states and the federal level.
Search
Patient Safety Tips for Obstetrics and Gynecology
These strategies can help you keep your patients safe and reduce potential liability.
Culturally Appropriate Care Strategies
A practitioner’s ability to understand and interact effectively with people from other cultures is critically important to helping to achieve health equity for all patients.
Meet Our Award-Winning Government Relations Team
Our Government Relations team is solely committed to legislative, regulatory, and judicial advocacy on a full-time basis.
Jan 30, 2025
Off-Label Use: Patient Safety Implications
Once authorized, a drug product may be prescribed by a licensed healthcare practitioner for any use deemed appropriate based on the practitioner’s professional opinion.
Third Party (Credentialing Facilities) FAQs
Answers to some of the common questions that third parties ask during the credentialing process
Keith Neff
Keith Neff founded Neff & Associates in 1986, and the agency has focused exclusively on medical malpractice insurance since its founding. He is based in Ocean City, Maryland.
Sep 05, 2025
Preventing Errors in Preoperative Clearance
Take this course to learn potential communication deficits in clinician-patient communication and how to incorporate an effective communication tool to reduce the risk of patient harm.
From
The Doctor’s Advocate
September 22, 2026, Doctors and Litigation: The L Word Podcast
Claims Frequency and Severity in 2026: An Interview With Robert E. White, Jr.
Robert E. White, Jr., President of The Doctors Company and TDC Group, discusses The Doctors Company’s claims data and the factors driving declining malpractice claim frequency and rising claim severity.
September 14, 2026, Medical Economics
10 Ways AI Is Creeping Into Medical Care
Richard E. Anderson, MD, FACP, cautions that physicians who act on AI recommendations that conflict with their clinical judgment and the standard of care could expose themselves to liability, as the legal system struggles to keep pace with AI’s role in medicine.
